|
Organizations can fall apart because people can't communicate
effectively. The problem is usually deeper however, than just
missing phone messages or emails. When communication is poor, the chance for conflict rises and
the chance of the conflict getting out of hand also rise. At the least, morale is in jeopardy. This is not just a technical "learn how to communicate" workshop. People will be challenged to think
differently about many issues.
It is not
uncommon to hear organizations complaining about poor communication
as being the cause of staff conflict and morale problems.
This needs to be explored on two levels - the organizational level,
and the person-to-person level. Sometimes in the organization
there is a problem where lines of communication have not been
thought out carefully, and people get missed in the chain.
There can also be a timing problem in the organization where people
are not informed of important information in a timely manner.
Occasionally, the problem is a hardware problem where the phones or
computers or pagers are not working the way they should.
On a person-to-person level, it is very common to have
individuals who have very different ways of communication with their
tone of voice, choice of words, body language, etc. Sometimes
the differences alone can cause conflict.
At the same time, there is no doubt there can be some people who
have developed very inappropriate way of communicating that may get
them what they want, but can cause a great deal of trouble for
others. Sometimes they're aware of this and don't care, and
sometimes they aren't aware of how they're coming across.
Finally, it would probably not be inaccurate to say there is an
epidemic of poor listening skills. People either don't listen
at all, or hear what they want to hear.
Usually, however, by the time the situation has turned into a
morale issue, the problem has become much deeper than a simple
communication one. In fact, my experiences has been that the
communication problem is hardly ever about software, hardware, or
style as such.
It is almost always about respect.
When people don't feel respected or acknowledged by either the
company or other individuals, conditions become ripe for conflict.
What makes it more complicated is that when organizations and
people don't list, it becomes more likely that fewer people will
actually communication with them so the problems fester.
When organizations and people talk to others in a way that could
easily be seen as condescending, patronizing, or even hostile,
people, at best, will stop listening, but much more likely, they
will become breeding grounds of conflict.
When that starts to happen, is that the individuals who feel
slighted start talking to others who perceive themselves in the same
situation and they feed off each other's frustrations. The
victim mentality grows and then communication gets really bad.
This presentation is designed first to remind management that the
best way to know how their communication network is working is to
listen to their workers, and second to remind individuals they
they must accept some responsibility for effective person-to-person
communication.
Part of the presentation is breaking down the actual elements of
communication and exploring the differences between styles.
The most important part of the presentation, however, is exploring
what people bring to the communication process; their own bias,
assumptions, thinking processes and other personal traits and how
those things affect the communication process and the conflict
level.
This is not just a theoretical presentation. Specific
situations are presented that are very typical in the work place and
in conflict situations. All the elements involved are explored as to
how they help or hinder the process. When possible,
roleplaying is utilized to practice different approaches.
This is a program that is most effective when it is is done in
the context of a training program over a period of time. However,
even a single presentation can bring in a lot of material, and give
a great deal of food for thought for the participation.
The main goals are to raise awareness in the participants as to
what is involved in the communication process, and in conflict
situations, give them strategies to change behaviors or patterns
that aren't working effectively, and challenge them to take
responsibility for improving the situation.
|